Fertilizer affordability and U.S.-China trade impacts are examined alongside cattle traceability concerns. Traceability measures in Canada generate strong producer reactions, with some viewing them as an overreach that adds unnecessary costs. Producers of beef, pork, and lamb express skepticism about incremental increases framed as improvements. A rancher, cattle feeder, and veterinarian argues that organizations such as CCA should not have stopped the process and should have shown leadership. The view is that prior consultations with producers provided sufficient justification to continue pushing forward with incremental changes.
"So far in 2026, there is not another storey that has produced so much emotion and feedback and just charge than the one on traceability. And CFIA came up with some recommendations on incremental increases or some would say improvements. Some would probably challenge that use of that word. When it comes to traceability around livestock in Canada, some feel it's a huge overreach, it's an overstep, it's adding costs to the system that are not necessary."
"I've heard from producers of beef and pork and lamb. But today on the show we've got a guest. He is a rancher, he's a cattle feeder, he's also a vet. He feels that organisations like CCA shouldn't have backed down. They should have showed real leadership and continue to push forward because the consultations with producers of the past number of years actually gave them the right to do so."
"Do you believe that groups like ABP and CCA should get back on the in support of these incremental changes or what do you think should happen? Absolutely. I mean, I'm surprised that they stopped the process. I mean, let's not forget when the whole CCIA was formed and our traceability system was"
#livestock-traceability #canada-cfia #beef-and-pork-production #fertilizer-affordability #us-china-trade
Read at Realagriculture
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]