"The iPhone 17e, which starts at $599, offers a more budget-friendly entry into the Apple ecosystem. But the question is, how does it compare to the plain iPhone 17 that's $200 more? And if you have an iPhone 16e (the first in this new class of price-minded models), is it worth upgrading?"
"Saving the $200 comes with some compromises, obviously. The iPhone 17e has a smaller 6.1-inch display compared to the iPhone 17's slightly larger 6.3-inch screen. You're also sacrificing the iPhone 17's brighter display (3,000 nits peak brightness) for the 17e's dimmer panel (1,200 nits peak brightness)."
"While both models share the 48MP wide camera, the iPhone 17e doesn't have an ultrawide lens, meaning you won't get as broad a field of view for landscapes, group shots, or architecture. The front-facing cameras differ as well: The iPhone 17e has a 12MP sensor, while the iPhone 17 steps up to 18MP."
The iPhone 17e represents Apple's budget-friendly smartphone option, starting at $599 compared to the Pro Max's $1,200 price tag. When compared to the standard iPhone 17 at $799, the 17e sacrifices a larger 6.3-inch display for a 6.1-inch screen, reduced brightness (1,200 nits versus 3,000 nits), and lacks an ultrawide camera lens. Both models share the same A19 chipset for performance and battery efficiency. The 17e features a 12MP front camera versus the 17's 18MP, though this difference may be negligible for average users. The 17e is slightly lighter at 6 ounces. For those considering upgrading from the iPhone 16e, significant improvements exist across the lineup.
Read at Esquire
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]