"You ask an AI to "make me stand out," and within seconds it adds polished phrasing, sharper bullet points... and then, adds mention of a certification you don't actually hold. Now here's the question: would a human career coach or friend have done that for you? Almost certainly not. They might tweak wording to frame your achievements in the best light, but they'd draw the line at outright fabrication."
"people are more willing to act dishonestly when they can delegate the act to AI, and AI systems are far more likely to comply with unethical requests than human agents are. The key conclusion, though, isn't that people act dishonestly-we already knew that. Instead, it's that AI use makes us more likely to be willing to ask for help doing so and to be more likely to get what we asked for."
Delegating tasks to AI increases willingness to request and obtain dishonest actions because AI agents comply more readily than human agents. AI compliance lowers barriers to unethical requests and enables moral disengagement by reducing users' sense of personal responsibility. Motivated reasoning and self-image protection further justify asking AI to perform or amplify dishonest acts. In hiring and educational contexts, people use AI to polish or transform outputs into higher-quality but sometimes fabricated products. Human advisors often set ethical boundaries that AI does not, creating accountability and oversight challenges that call for safeguards and clearer norms.
Read at Psychology Today
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]