"Generative AI (genAI) has passed the point of novelty. It's helping software engineers write code, lawyers draft contracts, and physicians summarize medical notes. It has quickly and quietly woven its way into the tools people use every day. The speed of genAI adoption has been staggering, but so has the uncertainty it has ushered in. As adoption continues to accelerate, one significant question looms: When will genAI transition from "experimental" to a truly "enterprise-grade" technology that we can trust with our data?"
"For all the enthusiasm around AI's potential, most technology providers today treat genAI as an optional add-on - one paired with disclaimers that distance them from responsibility for its accuracy, reliability, and compliance. That tension is particularly stark in highly regulated industries where organizations handle sensitive financial, health, or personal data. Here, genAI uncertainty often translates into fear and results in its outright rejection despite all it stands to offer."
Generative AI adoption has accelerated across professions, integrating into everyday tools but bringing significant uncertainty about trust and reliability. Technology providers often treat genAI as optional and use disclaimers that limit responsibility for accuracy, reliability, and compliance. Regulated industries handling sensitive financial, health, or personal data are especially hesitant, sometimes rejecting genAI outright due to risk concerns. Human oversight is identified as the critical missing element to build trust, because genAI outputs are non-deterministic and can include bias, hallucinations, or unauthorized data disclosures. Foundational guardrails and employee training on safe inputs are necessary before enterprise-wide adoption.
Read at Securitymagazine
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]