Inferred art-painting a computer program
Briefly

The article discusses the current hype surrounding generative AI, particularly with the release of OpenAI's GPT4o and the trend of 'Ghiblifying' images. This raises significant questions about the relationship between AI and art, especially regarding artists' rights and the distinction between genuine creation and imitation. The author suggests a unique approach: rather than generating images based on human prompts, we could create representations of what computers are doing, offering a new perspective on the intersection of artistic expression and artificial intelligence.
The rise of generative AI poses complex questions about creation, art, and the boundaries between human creation and machine mimicry.
Instead of using AI to generate what we want, we can visualize what a machine is doing, shifting the perspective of creativity.
The trend of 'Ghiblifying' images highlights the ongoing debate over AI's impact on artists' livelihoods and the definition of art.
Revisiting the relationship between human artistic expression and AI challenges us to redefine our concepts of creativity and authorship.
Read at Medium
[
|
]