AI hype promises revolutionary change and automation, but clear explanations of how AI helps humanity remain difficult. Governments and investors continue funding large amounts based on AI’s potential impact. A podcast exchange features billionaire AI investor Marc Andreessen, who admits that AI leaders have not sold AI effectively. When pressed to provide a direct pitch, he begins with an analogy to Isaac Newton’s search for alchemy, aiming to turn common materials into rare ones. He then compares turning sand into thought, but the explanation quickly becomes unclear. He moves away from the analogy toward claims about AI’s usefulness, without providing a concrete, comprehensible benefit.
"“So, you're saying that the people running AI have done a terrible job of selling AI,” Rogan said. “So sell it.” “Yes - oh, sell it, I mean, look, so it, it is, alright - I mean, alright I'm gonna give you the deepest of all pitches, I'm gonna give you the, the - okay,” Andreessen stammered right out of the gate. “So, uh, Isaac Newton spent 20 years looking for this key to what he called 'alchemy.' Uhm, and the idea of alchemy was to transmute something that was very common into something that was very rare.”"
"Andreessen goes on like this for the next minute, trying explain that Newton wanted to turn lead into gold, seemingly trying to draw a parallel to the tech industry's drive to turn sand - silicon - into thought. “In any event, you may know that he never - we have never figured out how to do that,” Andreessen continued. “And gold is still rare and valuable, so, imagine a form of alchemy that turns sand into thought. Pause on that for a moment.”"
"“It's barely comprehensible, to put it charitably. At any rate, Andreessen immediately abandons the alchemy analogy to explain that AI is actually good because stuff like lawsu”"
Read at Futurism
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]