"This wasn't an easy call. AI has an important role in national security. But surveillance of Americans without judicial oversight and lethal autonomy without human authorization are lines that deserved more deliberation than they got. This was about principle, not people."
"Anthropic insisted on prohibiting its AI systems being used in the mass surveillance of US citizens and autonomous weaponry without humans in the loop. When it became clear Anthropic wouldn't budge, the Pentagon cut off the company and made good on its threat to declare it a supply chain risk, which prohibits it from signing any military contracts."
"OpenAI had agreed that its AI systems could be used for all lawful purposes, and it was only after heated backlash that Altman said he would update the Pentagon deal to include specific protections on surveillance and autonomous weaponry."
OpenAI executive Caitlin Kalinowski, who led hardware and robotics efforts, resigned over the company's Department of Defense agreement allowing military deployment of its technology. Kalinowski objected to provisions enabling surveillance of Americans without judicial oversight and lethal autonomous systems without human authorization. Her departure highlights internal conflict over the deal, which OpenAI initially agreed would support all lawful purposes. The Pentagon agreement contrasts with rival Anthropic's refusal to accept similar terms, resulting in Anthropic being designated a supply chain risk. OpenAI subsequently modified its Pentagon agreement to include specific protections following public backlash, but the controversy triggered user migration to Anthropic's Claude.
Read at Futurism
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]