When AI fails, who is to blame?
Briefly

The article argues that users, not AI technologies, are responsible for errors produced by AI programs. Despite AI's ability to generate human-like text, it remains a tool that reflects user input. Confusion arises from misleading claims about AI's emotional capabilities, leading to user dependence. The author highlights cases of writers caught using AI for content generation without proper attribution, emphasizing a growing trend of reliance on AI among creatives. Ultimately, the piece urges accountability and understanding of human-AI interactions.
The fact that AI chatbots appear to speak human language has become a major source of confusion, leading to misconceptions about AI's capability to feel or think.
If a truck driver falls asleep at the wheel, it's not the truck's fault. The user is responsible for the outputs and errors generated by AI tools.
In 2025 alone, at least two other romance authors were caught using AI-generated prompts, indicating a concerning trend among writers towards AI dependency.
The user is responsible and should not blame AI for mistakes; AI is merely a tool, much like a pencil that cannot be at fault for a poor test score.
Read at Computerworld
[
|
]