Decapitated by activists: the collapse of CEO tenure and how to fight back | Fortune
Briefly

Decapitated by activists: the collapse of CEO tenure and how to fight back | Fortune
"These activist investors secretly strike terror in the hearts of boards and CEOs, seeking to profit quickly by buying stakes in companies to influence management and strategic decisions. Their goal is to unlock shareholder value that the activists claim is trapped-by complaining loudly in public about their point of view. They often push for what companies see as radical change: leadership shake-ups, operational overhauls, financial engineering, or strategic pivots they insist will capture that "hidden" value."
"Activists who want to shake up a company's leadership often escalate to a proxy fight-and they don't need a mountain of shares to start the brawl. Take Engine, a relatively small activist hedge fund that held only a 0.02% stake in ExxonMobil, but still launched a campaign and walked away with three seats on the board. That sent a chilling message to every CEO in America:"
"And I've seen things escalate quickly. If the idea of a sudden, bloody purge at the top of a company-a decapitation, French Revolution-style, gains traction with vocal investors, then a coup can quickly follow. This can disrupt, or even brutally accelerate a succession process that you thought you were managing. And it doesn't take billions to derail a peaceful transition, either."
Activist investors buy stakes to influence management and strategic decisions, aiming to unlock shareholder value they claim is trapped. They frequently push for radical changes such as leadership shake-ups, operational overhauls, financial engineering, or strategic pivots. Small stakes can trigger proxy fights that unseat executives and seize board seats, as shown by a tiny activist winning three ExxonMobil board positions with a 0.02% stake. Sudden, aggressive campaigns can disrupt or accelerate succession plans and destabilize leadership transitions. Activist demands can sometimes spur overdue change and short-term share-price gains, but they often impose painful disruption for executives and boards.
Read at Fortune
Unable to calculate read time
[
|
]