
The Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF provides exposure to seven mega-cap stocks—Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, Meta, Microsoft, NVIDIA, and Tesla—using an equal-weight approach. Each holding is kept near one-seventh of the portfolio, with quarterly rebalancing that trims stocks that have risen and tops up those that have lagged. The fund uses physical share holdings alongside total return swaps with counterparties, while Treasury bills and an ultra-short-duration ETF serve as collateral for swap positions. Over the past year, the ETF returned about 33%, compared with 37% for a broader Nasdaq-focused fund. Performance differences suggest the concentrated basket did not meaningfully underperform during that period, despite large dispersion among individual holdings.
"You are supposed to get equal weight to each Magnificent 7 stock. Thus, the ETF's composition has 7 near-equivalent chunks of Alphabet ( NASDAQ:GOOG), Amazon ( NASDAQ:AMZN), Apple ( NASDAQ:AAPL), Meta ( NASDAQ:META), Microsoft ( NASDAQ:MSFT), NVIDIA ( NASDAQ:NVDA), and Tesla ( NASDAQ:TSLA). Equal weighting means the fund mechanically trims winners every quarter and tops up laggards. If NVDA rips 30% in a quarter, MAGS sells some down to restore a one-seventh slice. Market-cap-weighted funds do the opposite, letting winners compound."
"Roundhill uses physical share holdings combined with total return swaps with Goldman Sachs and other counterparties to maintain Investment Company Act diversification compliance. The fund parks Treasury bills and the Roundhill Ultra Short Duration ETF as collateral against swap positions. Standard plumbing for this structure, but you own a contractual claim that tracks the stocks rather than always owning the shares themselves."
"Over the past year MAGS returned 33%. The Invesco QQQ ( NASDAQ:QQQ) returned 37% over the same window while holding the Mag Seven plus 93 other Nasdaq names. The concentrated bet matched a more diversified fund, which tells you the Mag Seven did the work either way. Concentration cost roughly nothing in this stretch."
Read at 24/7 Wall St.
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]