The difference between conviction and guesswork
Briefly

The difference between conviction and guesswork
"The strongest decisions rarely start with perfect data. They start with conviction, a hypothesis shaped by experience, customer insight, and pattern recognition. What ultimately separates high-performing product organizations from average ones is how quickly and confidently instinct is validated. That validation is the true role of product analytics, and increasingly, it is where AI amplifies its value."
"When analytics lives across multiple platforms, each with its own methodology and definitions, even basic questions become difficult to answer. AI magnifies that problem. Ask a simple question like, 'How many monthly unique visitors do we get?' With data spread across multiple analytics platforms, there is no clean answer. You cannot aggregate the numbers. There is no deduplication."
"That is not a tooling failure. It is a decision-making failure. The issue is not the tools themselves, but the absence of a clear leadership decision to standardize."
Product leadership success depends on conviction-driven decisions validated through analytics rather than waiting for perfect data. Analytics functions best as a decision engine that tests hypotheses and informs next steps. However, most organizations suffer from analytics sprawl—multiple competing platforms like Google Analytics, Amplitude, and Mixpanel creating fragmentation and inconsistent definitions. This fragmentation undermines decision-making by making basic questions unanswerable and causing teams to debate data accuracy rather than discuss insights. The problem stems from leadership failing to standardize analytics infrastructure, not from tool limitations. AI amplifies these issues when data exists across fragmented platforms.
Read at Fast Company
Unable to calculate read time
[
|
]