Crypto Underwriting Standards Remain Unclear for Mortgage Lenders

"Cryptocurrency is no longer a peripheral line item in borrower financial profiles. Approximately 30% of American adults now own it. Global ownership has surpassed an estimated 500 million people. The total housing market has crossed the $1 trillion mark multiple times in recent years. These numbers mean that lenders, originators and the regulators overseeing them are encountering digital assets in underwriting files with real regularity, and the frameworks they rely on were not designed for it."

"The hard discussions aren't over whether crypto wealth is real. In many cases, it is substantial. The sticking point is what crypto wealth actually means for underwriting: volatile asset valuation, inconsistent liquidity and documentation that doesn't map onto existing frameworks. The first problem is volatility. A crypto holding worth $1,000,000 at application may be worth considerably less by the time a loan closes."

"Equities carry similar risk, but conventional underwriting has developed standardized haircut methodologies for stock portfolios. No equivalent standard exists for digital assets. Each lender is currently making its own call on how much to discount holdings, which produces inconsistency across the market and uncertainty for borrowers who don't know which valuation will govern their file. The second is liquidity. Crypto can often be converted to cash, but not always quickly."

"There is no agreed pricing source, no standardized snapshot date and no method for reconciling discrepancies across exchanges. Two lenders reviewing the same wallet on the same day can arrive at different figures based on their own internal underwriting criteria. That inconsistency creates real problems for secondary mark"

Crypto holdings now appear regularly in borrower underwriting files because a large share of adults and hundreds of millions of people globally own digital assets. Lenders, originators, and regulators face frameworks that were not built for crypto. The main underwriting challenges are volatility, liquidity, and valuation. Volatility can reduce a crypto balance between application and loan closing, and there are no standardized haircut methodologies comparable to those used for stock portfolios. Liquidity is inconsistent because conversion to cash may be delayed by exchange issues, wallet access problems, or liquidation tax events, so crypto cannot always be treated as cash-equivalent. Valuation lacks an agreed pricing source, standardized snapshot date, and reconciliation method across exchanges, leading to different figures for the same wallet and creating downstream problems for secondary markets.

Read at www.housingwire.com