Ripple (XRP) News: Elizabeth Warren Says Ripple's Bank Charter Was Granted Illegally

Elizabeth Warren sent a letter to the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency seeking the full charter applications, the legal reasoning for approvals, and communications with the Trump family. The request focuses on whether approvals were influenced by political connections, including the Trump family’s crypto venture. Warren argues that the National Bank Act limits trust companies to safeguarding clients’ assets, while full banks take deposits and make loans under stricter rules and capital requirements. She claims applicants pursued a trust charter while planning activities associated with banks, such as facilitating payments, extending loans, and issuing stablecoins. She characterizes this as regulatory arbitrage that shifts risks to the broader banking system.

"Warren has gone to the regulator that approved the charter and asked, in effect, how it was ever allowed in the first place. Her letter didn't actually go to Ripple directly. It went to the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), the regulator that hands out these charters, on May 18. She gave the OCC until June 1 to hand over the full charter applications, the legal reasoning behind each approval, and its communications with the Trump family about the decisions."

"That last demand is the politically charged one. Warren has tied the speed of these approvals to Trump-administration influence, and she has pointed out that the Trump family's own crypto venture, World Liberty Financial, is in line for the same kind of charter. She frames the whole thing as a regulator bending the rules for a favored industry, though that remains her allegation rather than a proven fact."

"Her case rests on a line drawn in the National Bank Act. A trust company is allowed to do a fairly narrow job, holding and safeguarding clients' assets. A full bank is the thing that takes deposits and makes loans, and it answers to much stricter rules and capital requirements as a result. Warren's argument is that these firms applied for the narrow trust charter while writing business plans stuffed with things only a full bank should do."

"Warren calls this regulatory arbitrage, taking the lighter license to do the heavier job, and she argues it leaves the wider banking system carrying risks nobody signed off on. It's a real legal qu"

Read at 24/7 Wall St.