Millwall and Wrexham consider legal options over Southampton spying scandal

Southampton have been expelled from Saturday’s Championship playoff final and replaced by Middlesbrough after disciplinary decisions were upheld on appeal. Millwall and Wrexham will wait for the written reasons from the EFL independent disciplinary panel to determine whether the rulebook was applied correctly or whether the disciplinary process was flawed. They could argue that because Southampton’s spying on Middlesbrough occurred before the playoffs, the matches should have been replayed without Southampton’s involvement. Legal speculation includes possible injunction attempts, but timing makes this unlikely, so any claims would likely be retrospective for damages. Hull’s owner says legal advice supports automatic Premier League promotion, though Hull’s immediate prospects are limited, with potential damages claims if they lose at Wembley.

"Millwall and Wrexham are considering their legal options after confirmation that Southampton have been expelled from Saturday's Championship playoff final and replaced by the beaten semi-finalists Middlesbrough. The aggrieved clubs will await publication of the written reasons for the decisions taken by the English Football League's independent disciplinary panel, which were upheld by an appeal panel on Wednesday night, but are understood to believe they could have grounds to make a claim for compensation."

"Millwall and Wrexham could seek to test whether the EFL rulebook has been correctly applied or whether the disciplinary process was flawed, and could argue that because Southampton's spying on Middlesbrough took place before the playoffs, they should have been replayed without Southampton's involvement. Millwall were beaten by Hull in the playoff semi-finals after finishing third and Wrexham missed out after finishing seventh."

"There has been speculation in legal circles that one of the parties could seek an injunction at the high court to force the EFL to postpone Saturday's game but that is regarded as a non-starter owing to the timescale. Any claim would therefore be retrospective for damages. Hull's owner, Acun Ilicali, said on Wednesday that his club had received legal advice that they should be automatically promoted to the Premier League as a result of Southampton's expulsion rather than playing Middlesbrough."

"Publication of the written reasons will be key because there has been little explanation from the EFL as to how it arrived at its decisions and the process involved. By giving Southampton two sanctions expulsion from the final and a four-point penalty in next season's Championship after the club admitted to spying Middlesbrough, Oxford and Ipswich, it appear"

Read at www.theguardian.com