Bose released the $299 Lifestyle Ultra Speaker as a wired Wi‑Fi speaker designed to work best on a home network rather than relying on Bluetooth portability. The lack of an independent battery aligns it more with wired Sonos models, limiting outdoor use without power access. Its wired design provides ample power for multiple drivers, including a forward-firing woofer and tweeter plus an up-firing tweeter and midrange combination. Bose’s up-firing driver arrangement adds perceived space and height, making the speaker sound larger than its physical size. Sound performance was experienced during a demo and confirmed during home testing.
"The Lifestyle Ultra Speaker is an excellent-sounding speaker that gives Sonos a run for its money. Making Sonos sweat If Sonos is your direct comparisonand it probably will be, given the features and pricing of the Lifestyle Ultra Speakerthere's a bit of the Sonos Play and the Era 100 SL in Bose's offering."
"For one, the Lifestyle Ultra Speaker is wired (there's no independent battery) like the Sonos Era 100, which means, unlike the Sono Play, you'll most likely not be taking this thing with you to the park unless you have some kind of generator. That's okay, though, given the fact that these are Wi-Fi speakers, meaning they work best when hooked up to your home network, not just streaming music via Bluetooth the old-fashioned way."
"The wired nature also gives the Lifestyle Ultra Speaker plenty of power to supply an impressive array of drivers, including a forward-firing woofer and tweeter, as well as an up-firing, um twiddler. That's, unfortunately, a real term that Bose uses to describe the combination of a tweeter and a midrange driver. Despite the questionable naming, it's this driver that really makes this speaker special."
"With up-firing sound, the Lifestyle Ultra Speaker gains a real sense of space and height, which makes it sound larger than it is. That sense of space is something I experienced in my first demo as well as my testing at home. I can only describe Bose's wir"
Read at gizmodo.com
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]