"Detection tooling has gotten materially better. EDR, cloud security, email security, identity, and SIEM platforms ship with built-in detection logic that pushes MTTD close to zero for known techniques. That's real progress, and it's the result of years of investment in detection engineering across the industry."
"After the alert fires, the clock keeps running. An analyst has to see it, pick it up, assemble context from across the stack, investigate, make a determination, and initiate a response. In most SOC environments, that sequence is where the majority of the attacker's operating window actually lives."
"For a thorough investigation - one that results in a defensible determination, not a gut-feel close - that's 20 to 40 minutes of hands-on work, assuming the analyst starts immediately, which they rarely do."
Anthropic's Mythos Preview model exploited zero-day vulnerabilities, prompting warnings about rapid threat proliferation. Detection tools have improved, reducing mean time to detection (MTTD) for known techniques. However, the real challenge lies in the post-alert gap, where analysts must investigate alerts amidst competing tasks. This delay can extend response times to 20-40 minutes, allowing attackers to exploit vulnerabilities before defenders can react, highlighting a critical weakness in current cybersecurity practices.
Read at The Hacker News
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]