US lawmakers intensify scrutiny of scientific-publishing practices
Briefly

US lawmakers intensify scrutiny of scientific-publishing practices
"The US House of Representatives recently held a hearing addressing the growing concerns over high publishing fees and the impact of 'paper mills' on research integrity. Lawmakers from both parties agreed that these issues require more government attention, although they differed on potential solutions."
"The proposed 2027 budget includes a provision that would prevent researchers and universities from using federal funds for expensive subscriptions to academic journals and prohibitively high publishing fees, which have become a significant concern in the scientific community."
"Article processing charges (APCs), which can range from $1,000 to nearly $13,000 for prestigious journals, are seen by critics as detrimental to research funding, as they divert resources that could otherwise support scientific inquiry."
"Representative Zoe Lofgren highlighted the exploitation of scientists and taxpayers by for-profit publishers, stating that high publishing fees are a burden on those who conduct and fund research."
US lawmakers are focusing on issues in scientific publishing, particularly the high costs associated with open-access publishing and the prevalence of 'paper mills' selling authorships. A recent hearing by the US House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology highlighted a proposed budget provision to prohibit federal funding for expensive journal subscriptions and high publishing fees. Critics argue that article processing charges (APCs) hinder research funding, while publishers claim these fees are necessary for covering publication costs. Representative Zoe Lofgren emphasized the exploitation of scientists and taxpayers by for-profit publishers.
Read at Nature
Unable to calculate read time
[
|
]