"They broke into my house, put themselves onto my video cameras, and into my music career. With my freedom of speech, I had the right to talk about events going on in my life."
"if they hadn't wrongly raided my house, there would be no lawsuit. I don't go to their house, kick down their doors, flip them off on their surveillance cameras, then try to play the victim and sue them."
"Afroman's lawyer, David Osborne, argued this was a clear-cut First Amendment case. At trial, Afroman testified that cops had no one to blame for the reputational damage but themselves."
Seven Adams County Sheriff's Office officers sued rapper Afroman for defamation after he created music videos mocking their 2022 raid of his home that found no marijuana and resulted in no charges. The videos used actual raid footage from security cameras and recordings by Afroman's wife. Officers sought individual damages up to $1.5 million, claiming humiliation and death threats following viral videos. Afroman's defense centered on First Amendment protections, arguing officers were responsible for their own reputational damage by conducting an unjustified raid. The jury deliberated briefly before ruling entirely in Afroman's favor, rejecting all defamation claims.
Read at Ars Technica
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]