A federal judge in San Francisco, U.S. District Judge Susan Illston, is poised to block the Trump administration's extensive restructuring of the federal government, following a lawsuit by a coalition of unions and local governments. The plaintiffs argue Trump's actions lack Congressional authorization, violating the Constitution. Illston supports this view, asserting presidential changes require lawful processes and Congressional collaboration. With the administration asserting inherent authority to oversee the law's execution, the case tests limits of executive power, revealing tensions between branches of government.
Illston appeared to agree with the plaintiffs, asserting in the hearing that Supreme Court precedent makes clear that while the president does have the authority to seek changes at agencies, he must do so in lawful ways. She went on to say that critical transformations of the type Trump is attempting to carry out 'must have the cooperation of Congress.'
Illston noted that in his first term, Trump did in fact seek Congress' approval for similar restructuring plans. 'He could have done that here, but he didn't,' Illston said.
The case is just the latest in a string of court battles testing the limits of Trump's executive authority. In court filings, his administration has argued that he has 'inherent authority' to exercise control over those executing the nation's laws.
A temporary restraining order was likely necessary 'to protect the power of the legislative branch,' highlighting the importance of Congressional cooperation in the process.
Collection
[
|
...
]