""Both as lawyers and as persons of faith, not just blind followers, we will inevitably wrestle with questions of whether to disagree and how to do so productively.""
""There is a lot we can actually learn from judicial dissent about how to navigate that challenge.""
""Normally judges don't do that, but in death penalty cases, Brennan and Marshall dissented over and over again. It was a matter of integrity.""
""Judges can also manifest their disagreement in hopes of influencing the majority opinion or persuading other institutions of a different view.""
Dissent is a fundamental aspect of both the legal system and faith, emphasizing the importance of questioning rather than blind acceptance. Legal scholar Marco Basile encourages aspiring lawyers to learn from judicial dissent, which can take various forms and serve different purposes. He cites examples like Justices Brennan and Marshall, who consistently dissented in death penalty cases, and Justice Ginsburg's dissent in Ledbetter v. Goodyear, illustrating how dissent can influence majority opinions and promote integrity in legal practice.
Read at Harvard Gazette
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]