RedMagic 10S Pro+ tops AnTuTu's August leaderboard
Briefly

RedMagic 10S Pro+ tops AnTuTu's August leaderboard
"AnTuTu shared its top-performing device leaderboards for August. As usual, there are three lists with one reserved for flagship smartphones, another for midranges and a separate one for tablets. The data for these devices was gathered between August 1-31 and includes the average score of all the scores for that particular model. The top-performing flagship smartphone for last month is the RedMagic 10S Pro+, which uses an overclocked version of Qualcomm's Snapdragon 8 Elite dubbed Leading Version."
"Another Snapdragon 8 Elite phone slots in second place with vivo X200 Ultra and its average running score of 2,899,541 points. The third spot belongs to the iQOO Neo 10 Pro+, which also uses the 8 Elite and managed an average score of 2,875,495 points. The rest of the rankings show the Dimensity 9400+ powered vivo X200s at fourth place, followed by the Honor GT Pro, OnePlus 13, iQOO 13, Oppo Find X8 Ultra, Redmi K80 Ultra, and OnePlus Ace 5 Pro."
"The best-performing midranger for the month is the Realme Neo7 SE featuring MediaTek's Dimensity 8400-Max. It scored an average of 1,701,978 points. The Dimensity 8400-powered iQOO Z10 Turbo comes in second place with its average of 1,666,963 points. Third place goes to the Redmi Turbo 4, which also uses the Dimensity 8400-Ultra and managed an average score of 1,665,542 points."
AnTuTu's August leaderboards use average scores collected from August 1–31 for each model. The RedMagic 10S Pro+ topped the flagship list with an average of 2,947,567 points, followed by vivo X200 Ultra (2,899,541) and iQOO Neo 10 Pro+ (2,875,495), both powered by Snapdragon 8 Elite. The rest of the flagship top ten includes vivo X200s (Dimensity 9400+), Honor GT Pro, OnePlus 13, iQOO 13, Oppo Find X8 Ultra, Redmi K80 Ultra and OnePlus Ace 5 Pro. The midrange leaderboard was led by Realme Neo7 SE (Dimensity 8400-Max, 1,701,978). Tablets were led by RedMagic Tablet 3 Pro (2,909,018).
Read at GSMArena.com
Unable to calculate read time
[
|
]