Miami Heat fans may feel lingering stress from the Damian Lillard trade saga as the Giannis Antetokounmpo situation nears resolution. A key difference is that Joe Cronin and the Portland Trail Blazers reportedly refused to negotiate with Miami, which contributed to the deal falling through. In contrast, Milwaukee and Miami are believed to have been in discussions for months, including conversations at last year’s NBA Trade Deadline. If Giannis stays or is traded elsewhere, it is framed as less likely to result from Milwaukee refusing to talk with Miami. The Bucks are portrayed as negotiating in good faith, likely accommodating Giannis’s preferences while still seeking a strong return.
"It's totally normal for Miami Heat fans to be experiencing some PTSD (stemming from the Damian Lillard saga) as we inch closer and closer to a possible Giannis Antetokounmpo resolution. But they're missing one major difference between the Giannis situation and Lillard."
"It's the idea that Joe Cronin and the Portland Trail Blazers refused to negotiate with the Heat, something that the Bucks have not done. In fact, the belief is that Milwaukee and Miami have been talking for months now, stemming from their conversations at last year's NBA Trade Deadline."
"After Lillard was traded from the Blazers to the Bucks, there were reports that Cronin wouldn't even negotiate with Miami. That's significantly different than the situation that may be developing now between the Bucks and Heat."
"Again, whether the Heat land Giannis or not, the key here is that the Bucks don't appear to be negotiating in bad faith. Could they turn around and keep Giannis? Sure. But you'd have to imagine that would have more to do with Giannis changing his mind than it would with the Bucks."
Read at All U Can Heat
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]