"Throughout my career, I have been a huge supporter of empowering tenants to become homeowners, which is why it may seem odd that I do not support Intro. 902, or the Community Opportunity to Purchase Act (COPA). New York City absolutely needs to advance tenant and non-profit ownership, but I do not believe COPA is the way to achieve this laudable goal."
"To create real opportunities, we need two parties entering negotiations with the same goal in mind-the sale of the building to a non-profit or a direct sale to tenants. This happens when parties begin negotiating voluntarily, usually with a confidentiality agreement in place to establish good faith. COPA, on the other hand, tries to force parties into a negotiation and does so without any protections for the owner, such as confidential treatment of information they must share-step number one in any private sale negotiation."
Empowering tenants to become homeowners is a priority, but Intro. 902 (the Community Opportunity to Purchase Act, COPA) is criticized as an ineffective mechanism. Real opportunities arise when both parties voluntarily negotiate toward a sale to a nonprofit or direct tenant purchase, typically beginning with a confidentiality agreement and often culminating in a memorandum of understanding that builds trust. COPA forces negotiations and requires owners to disclose information without confidentiality protections, undermining foundational private-sale practices. Voluntary negotiations have produced tenant and nonprofit acquisitions, though they can be long, complex, and sometimes fail for reasons unrelated to owner unwillingness to sell.
Read at City Limits
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]