"There is no evidence that the child was a boy. Archaeology as a science emerged in the 19th century, dominated by men, who interpreted the evidence based on contemporary gender roles."
"Much of what we were told about early human lives has been challenged in the last few decades. When it comes to lives in the Upper Paleolithic, we have nothing to go on."
"Let us agree that if child and dog stood next to each other at the same time (and even that is still disputed), girl and dog is just as likely as boy and dog."
The interpretation of early human lives, particularly in the Upper Paleolithic, has been influenced by contemporary gender roles. The assumption that a child depicted alongside a dog was a boy lacks evidence. Recent archaeological findings suggest that both genders could have existed in such contexts. The narrative surrounding these early interactions is being re-evaluated, emphasizing that a girl and dog scenario is equally plausible. This shift reflects broader changes in how archaeology approaches gender and representation in historical contexts.
Read at www.theguardian.com
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]