USMV's Minimum Volatility Promise Got Trounced By the S&P 500. Wait for Redemption or Run?

USMV tracks the MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Index, selecting large- and mid-cap US stocks to minimize portfolio-level volatility while applying sector and turnover constraints. The holdings tilt toward lower-beta sectors such as utilities, healthcare, and consumer staples, with underweights in higher-beta technology and consumer discretionary names. Returns have been smoother than the broad market, with about 45% total return over five years versus about 92% for SPY. On a $100,000 investment, the difference implies tens of thousands in foregone compounding. The fund’s dividend income and modest price appreciation support results, and the 0.15% expense ratio is relatively reasonable. In 2022, USMV fell 9% versus SPY’s 20%, but it still declined 18.5% peak to trough, and performance outside that period has been weaker.

"USMV tracks the MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Index, which optimizes large- and mid-cap US stocks for the lowest portfolio-level volatility subject to sector and turnover constraints. The result is a tilt toward utilities, healthcare, consumer staples, and big-cap stalwarts with low historical beta, plus a structural underweight in the high-beta tech and consumer discretionary names that drove the broad index for most of the past five years. You are buying a smoother heart rate. The horse is slower."

"USMV returned roughly 45% over the past five years. SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust ( NYSEARCA:SPY) returned roughly 92% over the same window. On a $100,000 starting stake, the smoother ride cost the USMV holder tens of thousands in foregone compounding."

"In 2022, the year minimum volatility was supposed to earn its keep, USMV fell 9% while SPY fell 20%. That is a measurable cushion: roughly half the drawdown in the one calendar year of the past five where drawdown protection mattered. And before you get the wrong idea, USMV is not infallible. This ETF declined 18.5% peak to trough during the 2022 selloff."

"The return engine is dividends from the underlying defensives plus modest capital appreciation. The 0.15% expense ratio is reasonable for a factor product, and the 1.5% distribution yield sits roughly in line with the broad market. The fund still holds about $23 billion, but net outflows of ~$13 billion over five years suggest institutional holders have been quietly leaving the room."

Read at 24/7 Wall St.