Should the Loch Ness Monster have a scientific name?
Briefly

Should the Loch Ness Monster have a scientific name?
"A debate over a potential newly discovered species, and a tip for buying good sherry in this week's pick from the Nature archive."
"50 years ago doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-025-03991-9 This article features text from Nature's archive. By its historical nature, the archive includes some images, articles and language that by twenty-first-century standards are offensive and harmful. Find out more."
A debate centers on whether a recently encountered organism constitutes a distinct species, focusing on whether distinguishing characteristics and available evidence justify taxonomic separation. Some observers contend the differences indicate speciation, while others argue they fall within intraspecific variation and require additional data and analysis. Resolving the taxonomic question has implications for biodiversity records and conservation priorities. Separately, concise consumer guidance clarifies practical criteria for selecting good sherry, helping buyers assess bottles and match quality and taste preferences while improving value for money and satisfaction.
Read at Nature
Unable to calculate read time
[
|
]