Many scientists have mixed feelings about spreadsheets due to their accessibility and potential for errors like accidental overwrites or miscalculations. While some believe spreadsheets are ineffective for science, experts like Yanina Bellini Saibene assert that they can be valuable tools if used correctly. However, the lack of standardized training often leads to poor data-management practices, as noted by statistician Karl Broman. To improve spreadsheet usage in research, it's essential to ask critical questions about raw data handling and proper management techniques.
Spreadsheets are broadly accessible but can cause headaches for the unwary, as errors may arise from accidental overwrites or incorrect calculations.
Yanina Bellini Saibene notes that a spreadsheet's effectiveness in science depends on how they are used, and they should be included in researchers' toolboxes.
Karl Broman highlights that a lack of standardized training has led to bad data-management habits, undermining the usefulness of spreadsheets.
When using spreadsheets for research, ask yourself questions to ensure effectiveness, including how to handle raw data correctly.
Collection
[
|
...
]