Making Morocco AFCON champions was correct, but why did CAF take so long?
Briefly

Making Morocco AFCON champions was correct, but why did CAF take so long?
"Article 82 of the CAF regulations is crystal clear: 'If, for any reason whatsoever, a team ... leave the ground before the regular end of the match without the authorisation of the referee, it shall be considered looser [sic] and shall be eliminated for good from the current competition.' Article 84 goes on to state that if you contravene Article 82 you 'will lose [the] match by three-nil.'"
"The Senegal players protested and, almost to a man, walked off the pitch and down the tunnel, led by their coach, Pape Thiaw. Those same players returned some 10 minutes later, grudgingly re-entering the pitch. Play resumed a full 17 minutes after it was halted, with Morocco's Brahim Díaz taking an ill-advised 'Panenka-style' penalty kick that was easily saved by Senegal keeper Édouard Mendy."
"All that is gone now and, from a strict reading of both the tournament regulations and the Laws of the Game, it's the correct decision. Justice was done. Justice delayed, mind you, because it never should have taken this long, but justice nonetheless."
Senegal's Africa Cup of Nations victory from January was overturned by CAF's appeal body and awarded to Morocco. During the controversial final, Senegal players protested a contentious penalty decision and walked off the pitch led by their coach, returning after approximately 10 minutes. Morocco missed the penalty, and Senegal scored in extra time to win 1-0. However, CAF regulations Article 82 explicitly states that teams abandoning the field without referee authorization are considered losers and eliminated from competition. Article 84 mandates a 3-0 loss for such violations. The appeal body correctly applied these regulations, making the decision legally sound despite the significant delay in enforcement.
Read at ESPN.com
Unable to calculate read time
[
|
]