Teenagers often exhibit less-developed executive functions, which contribute to their involvement in juvenile crime. The motivations for violent juvenile crime, particularly within familial contexts, are often complex and deeply interpersonal. Early child abuse can distort both stress response systems and perceptions of reality, leading to severe repercussions. The recent re-sentencing of the Menendez brothers highlights changes in laws regarding youthful offenders, reflecting an understanding that critical brain areas for judgment and decision-making mature later in life. Their case showcases the depth of trauma influencing criminal actions, particularly regarding familial abuse.
The motivation for parricide is often rooted in complex interpersonal factors, particularly in the context of severe childhood trauma, such as sexual and emotional abuse.
California's legal system acknowledges that teenagers' executive functions are not fully developed until their mid- to late twenties, impacting judgments and decisions.
The Menendez brothers' case exemplifies how early child abuse can distort a child's perception of reality and response to stress, leading to tragic outcomes.
Early exposure to trauma can shatter a child's sense of safety, especially when the abuser is a parent, making home a place of fear instead of trust.
Collection
[
|
...
]