"But this verdict is bigger than one case. For years, social media companies have profited from targeting children while concealing their addictive and dangerous design features. Today's verdict is a referendum - from a jury, to an entire industry - that accountability has arrived."
"Juries in New Mexico and California have recognized that Meta's public deception and design features are putting children in harm's way."
"This case misunderstands YouTube, which is a responsibly built streaming platform, not a social media site."
A Los Angeles jury's verdict against social media companies marks a significant step in holding them accountable for their practices. Joseph VanZandt emphasized that the ruling reflects a broader industry accountability. Meta and Google expressed disagreement with the verdict, with Google asserting that YouTube is a responsibly built platform. Concurrently, a New Mexico jury ordered Meta to pay $375 million for failing to protect young users. This case highlights the recognition of the dangers posed by social media to children, prompting calls for safer practices.
Read at Kqed
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]