Map vs FlatMap in Spark with Scala: What Every Data Engineer Should Know
Briefly

Map vs FlatMap in Spark with Scala: What Every Data Engineer Should Know
"If you've worked with big data long enough, you know that the smallest syntax differences can have massive performance or logic implications."
"That's especially true when working in Spark with Scala, where functional transformations like map and flatMap control how data moves, expands, or contracts across clusters."
"case class Book(title: String, author: String, category: String, rating: Double)val books = sc.parallelize(Seq( Book("Sapiens", "Yuval Harari", "Non-fiction", 4.6), Book("The Selfish Gene", "Richard Dawkins", "Science", 4.4), Book("Clean Code", "Robert Martin", "Programming", 4.8), Book("The Pragmatic Programmer", "Andrew Hunt", "Programming", 4.7), Book("Thinking, Fast and Slow", "Daniel Kahneman"..."
map applies a one-to-one transformation that preserves element cardinality. flatMap applies a function that returns collections and flattens them, producing variable cardinality and potential expansion or contraction of the dataset. Mapping a Book to a single field produces one output per book, while flatMapping to tokens, categories, or optional values can produce many outputs per input and increase processing, shuffles, and memory pressure. flatMap is appropriate for tokenization, expanding nested structures, or converting Option to zero-or-one elements. map is appropriate for simple projections. Careful choice prevents unintended data explosion and logic errors in distributed pipelines.
Read at Medium
Unable to calculate read time
[
|
]