Bill O'Reilly Floored By Megyn Kelly's Epstein Comments
Briefly

Bill O'Reilly Floored By Megyn Kelly's Epstein Comments
"Kelly said: This person has told me from the start, years and years ago, that Jeffrey Epstein, in this person's view, was not a pedophile this is this person's view who was there for a lot of this but that he was into the barely legal type. Like, he liked 15-year-old girls. And I realize this is disgusting, I'm definitely not trying to make an excuse for this, I'm just giving you facts, that he wasn't into, like, eight-year-olds, but he liked the very young teen types that could pass for even younger than they were, but would look legal to a passerby. And that is what I believed and that is what I was reliably told for many years."
"In a YouTube video this week addressing social media influencers, O'Reilly did a fact check of conspiracies pushed by Candace Owens and Nick Fuentes. The former Fox News host also addressed controversy his ex-colleague Kelly has stirred up over comments about Epstein. O'Reilly praised Kelly as a very good broadcaster and made clear he had no malice towards anyone he was covering. On the November 12 episode of The Megyn Kelly Show, Kelly told NewsNation host Batya Ungar-Sargon she knew someone very close to the Epstein case. The former Fox News host then clarified that this person did not think Epstein was a pedophile."
Bill O'Reilly fact-checked conspiracies from Candace Owens and Nick Fuentes in a YouTube video and addressed controversy around Megyn Kelly's comments on Jeffrey Epstein. O'Reilly praised Kelly as a skilled, popular broadcaster and said he harbored no malice. On her November 12 show, Kelly relayed that a person close to the Epstein case believed Epstein was not a pedophile but favored 'barely legal' teens, including 15-year-olds, and emphasized she was not excusing the conduct. Critics questioned the point of distinguishing between degrees of wrongdoing, and O'Reilly asked why the distinction mattered given Kelly's legal background.
Read at www.mediaite.com
Unable to calculate read time
[
|
]