Hamit Coskun was fined for burning a Qur'an outside the Turkish consulate in London. The judge classified his actions as influenced by a hatred of Muslims, rejecting his defense of free speech. Coskun contended that he was protesting Islam rather than targeting its followers. His case has sparked debate, with organizations supporting his appeal against the conviction. The ruling has drawn political attention, emphasizing the tension between free expression and hate-driven speech, notably endorsed by Kemi Badenoch, who affirmed rights to belief and non-belief in Britain.
Judge John McGarva stated that Hamit Coskun's actions were highly provocative and motivated at least in part by a hatred of Muslims, emphasizing the distinction between free speech and hate speech.
Coskun argued that his actions were merely a protest against Islam and part of his free speech rights, which sparked significant dialogue regarding the boundaries of freedom of expression.
Both the National Secular Society and the Free Speech Union criticized the ruling, indicating they plan to appeal, with the statement that they will continue until the ruling is overturned.
Kemi Badenoch remarked on social media that the case should be appealed and emphasized that freedom of belief and non-belief are inalienable rights in Britain.
Collection
[
|
...
]