Who's really to blame for Labour's troubles Rachel Reeves or the invisible PM? | Gaby Hinsliff
Briefly

Rachel Reeves, the first chancellor to have her tears impact financial markets, was observed crying due to a personal issue during a parliamentary session. Her emotional moment led to a decline in the pound and an increase in borrowing costs. Despite this, Keir Starmer failed to acknowledge her distress, continuing with his discussion without noticing. Later, he expressed regret and supported her emotionally. The incident exemplifies the heavy burden Reeves bears in her role, alongside the broader implications of emotional reactions in a political context.
Rachel Reeves is the first chancellor whose tears have moved markets. Her emotional moment during PMQs saw the pound drop and borrowing costs rise, highlighting the serious consequences of public sentiment.
Starmer's failure to notice Reeves' distress during PMQs symbolizes his occasional detachment from government affairs. This scenario reveals the weight of Reeves' responsibilities and the challenges of leading under pressure.
Read at www.theguardian.com
[
|
]