Contributor: Take it from California's election czar, the SAVE Act is a sham
Briefly

Voting is presented as a lifeline in the article, reflecting on the author's family's experience with discrimination and the historical struggle for voting rights. The SAVE Act, recently approved by the House, claims to address illegal voting but is critiqued as a deceptive effort to disenfranchise marginalized populations. There's a strong warning against fearmongering around voter fraud, which is presented as exceedingly rare. Ultimately, this legislation is characterized as an attempt to undermine constitutional rights, drawing parallels to Jim Crow laws.
The SAVE Act, touted as a measure to prevent illegal voting, is actually designed to disenfranchise millions of eligible voters, particularly those from underserved communities.
My family's journey from sharecropping to voting illustrates that, for many, the struggle for the right to vote is intertwined with personal safety and historical trauma.
Read at Los Angeles Times
[
|
]