The conclave's process of electing a Pope is not only secretive but also marked by intriguing complexities. Historical data from the last ten conclaves, particularly underlined by scholars Giancarlo Zizola and Alberto Melloni, illustrates that votes fluctuate until a consensus emerges, often favoring candidates initially viewed as underdogs. For instance, the 1903 conclave is notable for the first use of a political veto by Austria, showcasing the interplay of external influences alongside the expected divine guidance during these pivotal elections.
The dynamics of a conclave are deeply mysterious, with votes shifting and fluctuating towards a single name, often not among the initial favorites.
To understand the workings of a conclave, examining the last ten conclaves reveals repeating patterns influenced by both divine and earthly factors.
Collection
[
|
...
]