Lawmakers and animal rights advocates oppose the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's plan to shoot 450,000 barred owls over thirty years to protect northern and California spotted owls. Proponents argue the culling is necessary, while opponents claim it is too costly and inhumane. Recent cancellations of owl-related grants, totaling $1.1 million, highlight funding challenges. There are suggestions that Congress could reverse the plan entirely through the Congressional Review Act. The debate reflects broader tensions between conservation efforts and animal welfare concerns.
"Supporters of the approach believe the cull is necessary to avert disastrous consequences for the spotted owls. But the coalition argues the effort is too expensive, unworkable and inhumane."
"Under President Donald J. Trump's leadership, we are eliminating wasteful programs, cutting unnecessary costs and ensuring every dollar serves a clear purpose."
Collection
[
|
...
]