At Harvard, a clash between democracy and monarchy
Briefly

Curtis Yarvin, a far-right writer and neo-monarchist, debated Danielle Allen, a Harvard political theorist, at an event organized by Passage Publishing and the John Adams Society. Yarvin's controversial views on dismantling American democracy in favor of a more autocratic system have gained him notoriety and attention from influential figures on the right. The debate epitomized a clash between his far-right ideologies and Allen's advocacy for liberal democracy, highlighting the growing tensions within American political discourse.
Yarvin's argument that American democracy has exhausted itself and needs to be replaced by one-man rule has made him a star on the right.
The debate was a clash between monarchism and liberal democracy, showcasing the tensions between Yarvin's views and those of his opponent, Danielle Allen.
Read at Boston.com
[
|
]