California's lawsuit asserts that Trump's tax law is unconstitutionally vague and infringes on Planned Parenthood's First Amendment rights by disallowing Medicaid reimbursements for clinics primarily providing abortions. The law took effect on July 4 and has raised concerns about patient care disruptions. California officials emphasize that the law restricts access to vital healthcare services, not federal funding for abortions. Talwani noted that this restriction could lead to adverse health consequences, while Planned Parenthood pledges to continue fighting for reproductive health access despite the challenges.
Talwani reasoned that disruptions to patient care are likely to result in "adverse health consequences," including an increase in unintended pregnancies, pregnancy complications and undiagnosed cancers and sexually transmitted infections.
Bonta stated, "We won't sit back while Congress and this federal administration tries to roll back our progress, silence their opposition and ignore the rule of law."
Adams expressed that Planned Parenthood Mar Monte will continue to fight against any attempt to restrict abortion and reproductive health care access.
Talwani wrote that restricting access to [Planned Parenthood] healthcare clinics will negatively affect more than just reproductive health; [Planned Parenthood clinics] often serve as a source of primary care for patients.
Collection
[
|
...
]