"Well, I don't think that's true, but I mean, obeying the Fourth Amendment or the Constitution shouldn't be too difficult. The new nominee for DHS in his nomination hearing actually spoke in favor of having judicial warrants. It's the way we've always done it."
"It is for. No, no, for invading homes, for going into the home to get someone. We've always had judicial warrants. They're administered and issued by local judges. It is something we fought the revolution over."
"One, it's a big deal, because sometimes they make a mistake and go in the wrong house. And so we're very, very careful about getting judicial warrants. I don't think that's too big a step to have."
"But there's this unwillingness to sort of admit, we made mistakes, we're doing better. I think Homan actually has done a good job."
Senator Rand Paul challenged CNBC host Joe Kernen's assertion that judicial warrants for deportations are impractical. Paul argued that obeying the Fourth Amendment is essential and highlighted that judicial warrants have historically been required for actions like entering homes. He referenced the historical significance of the Fourth Amendment and the fight for its inclusion in the Constitution. Paul expressed belief that some Republicans would support the idea of requiring judicial warrants, emphasizing the need for accountability and acknowledgment of past mistakes in immigration enforcement.
Read at www.mediaite.com
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]