The article discusses differing perspectives from right-wing commentators on President Trump's recent remarks regarding Iran. While some, like Dave Rubin and Ben Shapiro, praise Trump's handling of foreign relations and his avoidance of war, Trump's suggestion of a potential 'regime change' in Iran immediately sparked concern among some of his supporters. Charlie Kirk attempted to differentiate between organic revolutions and top-down regime changes, facing backlash from his peers. The discussion underscores a broader tension within right-wing circles regarding military action and the implications of Trump's policies.
President Trump was never going to start world war three...he played this absolutely perfectly... President Trump was not dragged into a war, he managed this with absolutely stunning professionalism.
It's not politically correct to use the term, 'Regime Change,' but if the current Iranian Regime is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN, why wouldn't there be a Regime change???
A bottom-up revolution rises from the will of the people. A top-down regime change is engineered by elites and the intel community.
Oh now it's TOP DOWN US led regime change that you're against... Not just regular old regime change.
Collection
[
|
...
]