The Department of Justice's request to release grand jury transcripts concerning Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell failed to calm critics concerned about transparency. Only two law enforcement officers had testified in the grand jury, contradicting claims that unsealing would provide significant insights. Judge Paul Engelmayer rejected the request, emphasizing that the transcripts would not reveal valuable information, stating 'there is no there' there.' Analysts speculate that political considerations may prevent Attorney General Pam Bondi and FBI Director Kash Patel from disclosing additional documents related to Epstein.
The justice department's filings in this request revealed that only two law enforcement officers testified during grand jury proceedings in New York, undermining notions that unsealing them would reveal numerous truths.
Insofar as the motion to unseal implies that the grand jury materials are an untapped mine lode of undisclosed information about Epstein or Maxwell or confederates, they definitively are not that.
Judge Paul Engelmayer's written decision suggests that anyone expecting new information to emerge from the documents would come away feeling disappointed and misled.
Neama Rahmani stated that the US attorney general and FBI director have the legal power to release other documents, suggesting political motivations may hinder transparency.
Collection
[
|
...
]