"The strongest and most prosecutable case against those seeking to overturn the 2020 Presidential election results and prevent the certification of those votes was the one investigated and indicted by Special Counsel Jack Smith. Although Special Counsel Jack Smith's federal case encompassed evidence from multiple states, he ultimately concluded the federal case could not be prosecuted because of the U. S. Supreme Court's decision in Trump v. United States and the re-election of President Donald J. Trump."
"Conversely, a select few of Mr. Trump's agents and elector nominees had insight into the ultimate plan to use the fraudulent elector certificates to disrupt the congressional certification on January 6 and willingly assisted.... In each of the targeted states, Mr. Trump and his co-conspirators successfully organized enough elector nominees and substitutes to gather on December 14, cast fraudulent electoral votes on his behalf, and send them to Washington, D.C., for the congressional certification."
Peter Skandalakis asked to dismiss the Georgia prosecution against Donald Trump. The fault for its dismissal is attributed to Fani Willis for giving him the opportunity to move for dismissal. Skandalakis' dismissal is characterized as dishonest in many respects and false regarding his claim that Special Counsel Jack Smith concluded he could not prosecute after Supreme Court intervention. Special Counsel Jack Smith investigated and indicted what is described as the strongest, most prosecutable case against those who sought to overturn the 2020 Presidential election and obstruct certification. Smith's federal case encompassed multi-state evidence and is reported to have concluded prosecution could not proceed because of the Trump v. United States decision and President Trump's re-election.
Read at emptywheel
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]