"Come on, people! Carville said. Wake up! If you think this is anything remotely legit, or this is in furtherance of some foreign policy aim, or some aim of American interests, come on, please! Please, people! It's all about Epstein! Wake up! Get the scales off your eyes! Think beyond just the front of your nose! This is Epstein health subsidiesThis is a giant diversionary tactic."
"What the f*ck has he ever done that's not totally thought out that's even marginally thought out?! Carville said. Of course, now, we claim to have the moral high ground to criticize [Vladimir] Putin for the illegal invasion of a sovereign nation Well, our case got a little bit weaker now, didn't it? The famed political operative went on to trash Congress and the Supreme Court for in his view effective ceding their powers to Trump."
The strike on Venezuela functions as a diversionary action intended to shift public focus away from the Epstein files and other White House criticisms. The strike is described as lacking legitimate foreign policy aims or clear American-interest justification and as chiefly designed for political distraction. Concerns are raised about inadequate consideration of consequences and of follow-up steps after a potential capture of Venezuelan leader Nicolas Maduro. The action is said to weaken moral authority to criticize Russia's invasion of a sovereign nation. Congress is depicted as passive and indecisive, and the Supreme Court is followed but not respected.
Read at www.mediaite.com
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]