A U.S. District Judge has ruled that the Trump administration's cancellation of research grants was illegal and questioned the motives behind the cuts, indicating potential racial discrimination and discrimination against the LGBTQ community. The judge described the process as arbitrary, challenging the administration's justification for canceling grants aimed at diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI). He emphasized the importance of such funding in addressing health disparities, suggesting a disconnect between policy decisions and Congress's intent. The ruling impacts a subset of grants affected by ongoing lawsuits, with further legal actions anticipated from the administration.
U.S. District Judge William Young criticized the Trump administration's cancellation of research grants as "arbitrary and capricious", raising issues of racial and LGBTQ discrimination.
During the hearing, Judge Young pushed for a formal definition of DEI, highlighting the inconsistency in canceling grants linked to health disparities.
Collection
[
|
...
]