A federal judge indicated that Secretary of State Marco Rubio likely violated the Constitution by deporting Mahmoud Khalil for his pro-Palestinian activism. However, U.S. District Judge Michael Farbiarz did not release Khalil from detention, citing insufficient evidence of irreparable harm. Khalil is contested for an immigration charge alleged by the government post-arrest, characterized by his lawyers as retaliatory due to his speech. The case raises questions about the unconstitutional use of immigration law for political dissent, and further developments are anticipated as Khalil's legal team continues their fight for his release.
Khalil's attorneys argue that the charge against him was a retaliatory measure stemming from his advocacy. We will continue to fight for his release.
Despite ruling against the expedited release of Khalil, Judge Farbiarz acknowledged the constitutional issues surrounding Secretary Rubio's actions.
The government’s conduct in this case raises serious First Amendment concerns, reflecting a troubling intersection of immigration enforcement and political dissent.
Judge Farbiarz emphasized the need for further evidence regarding the claim of irreparable harm, hinting at possible future developments in Khalil's case.
Collection
[
|
...
]