Lucy Letby's case presents two opposing narratives; one frame her as a murderer of seven infants, while the other depicts her as a victim of a flawed justice system. Mark McDonald, Letby’s barrister, claims her innocence backed by expert opinions that dispute the prosecution’s medical evidence. Families of the infants insist Letby's defenders misrepresent evidence, causing them distress. Letby faced a ten-month trial resulting in convictions based on a range of substantial evidence, culminating in unanimous jury verdicts for some cases.
The question of Lucy Letby's guilt is divided into two perspectives: one viewing her as a murderer and the other seeing her as a victim of a flawed system.
Mark McDonald argues that Letby is innocent and backed by experts claiming there is no evidence of deliberate harm to any infants.
The families of the infants maintain that Letby's defenders are distorting evidence, and express distress over the ongoing doubts about her guilt.
Despite the ongoing debate, Letby was convicted after a ten-month trial with substantial evidence, leading to unanimous jury verdicts in several cases.
Collection
[
|
...
]