"The rot is undeniable, and it's produced a moral backlash that sometimes flattens everyone into the same shade of stain. But the person who looks the other way is not the same as the person who looks for victims."
"Reading these exchanges as individual acts rather than a monolith is a useful exercise because you can begin to see how at least some otherwise-decent people-in a weak moment, in the wrong circumstance-behaved the way they did."
"Couric complimented Epstein's lasagna. Andrew has been accused of having sex with a teenage victim of Epstein's trafficking network."
The Epstein files contain nearly 3.5 million pages detailing interactions with various individuals, some of whom displayed varying degrees of moral complicity. While some were euphemistic about their interests, others were overtly flattering towards Epstein. The moral implications of these interactions are complex, as not all individuals involved are equally culpable. The files illustrate that individuals can behave poorly under certain circumstances, and understanding these nuances is essential for a fair assessment of their actions and motivations.
Read at The Atlantic
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]