"Fox News host Laura Ingraham questioned Rep. James Comer (R-KY) on Tuesday when he insisted that former President Joe Biden's pardons should be voided. Hours earlier, House Overnight Republicans released a report detailing alleged new findings in their investigation in Biden's use of autopen technology allowing one to apply a signature on a document without physically signing it. Republicans have continually called Biden's mental acuity into question, casting doubt on the validity of the various documents he signed in the final months of his presidency."
"But that's all well and good to say they're null and void; but I'm a lawyer, so I'm going to ask you this: is there really any legal means of challenging these pardons? I mean, I don't see any federal court that wants to get involved in what seems to be unknowable with the president's plenary pardon power. I, I just, I think they're going to call it a political question and say we're not getting involved."
House Oversight Republicans released a report alleging that President Biden used autopen technology to apply signatures without physically signing documents. Republicans questioned Biden's mental acuity and raised doubts about the validity of documents signed during the final months of the presidency. Rep. James Comer declared that pardons signed before Biden left office should be null and void and called autopen-signed executive actions invalid. Comer cited testimony from a former White House physician and other staffers in support of his position. Laura Ingraham questioned the legal avenues for challenging pardons given the president's broad pardon power and political-question concerns.
Read at www.mediaite.com
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]