""In the short term probably yes, in the long term probably no," said Kristofer Allerfeldt, a University of Exeter professor specializing in American history. But he said Charles had "definitely clawed back some of the prestige of the monarchy" in his homeland with his assured performance."
"Like all royal visits, the four-day trip to Washington, New York and Virginia by the king and Queen Camilla was a carefully choreographed diplomatic event carried out at the request of the U.K. government."
"Trump has criticized Keir Starmer, dismissing Britain's leader as "not Winston Churchill," the World War II prime minister who coined the phrase "special relationship" for the U.K.-U.S. bond."
"None of that has soured Trump's fondness for the British monarchy, which seems to have been deepened by the president's unprecedented second state visit to the U.K. in September."
The king's recent four-day diplomatic visit to the U.S. was designed to improve the strained U.K.-U.S. relationship, particularly regarding the Iran war. Kristofer Allerfeldt noted that while the visit may have short-term benefits, long-term impacts remain uncertain. The trip coincided with the U.S. 250th birthday celebrations and aimed to mend rifts with the Trump administration. Despite some political opposition, the visit was largely successful, showcasing warmth and minimizing awkward interactions, reinforcing the monarchy's standing in the U.K.
Read at Fortune
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]